A 300-word
Summary of
300 words, 50 words x 6 sentences ; 30 words x 10 sentences etc
1. Introductory background information that leads into …
What problem does this work attempt to solve?
What is the scope of the project / research?
What is the main argument, thesis or claim?
2. A statement of the study aim
Introductory statements can lead into a statement of how your research uniquely addresses the issue with phrases such as:
“Here, < name of researcher > aimed to…”
or
“Here, < name of researcher > demonstrates that…”
both indicate to the reader that you are stating the aim or purpose of the work.
3. Brief description of the methods
A summary of a scientific work may include specific models, design or approaches used in study / studies.
Describe the types of evidence used in the research.
Excessive detail is unnecessary; however, you should briefly state the key techniques used.
4. Describe the most important observations of the study/studies
Experimental manipulation (group, conditions, factors)
Metrics of inferences (descriptive statistics, between condition differences, likelihoods / confidence (e.g. P values)
5. State an accurate and concise conclusion that does not overstate the results.
Did the methods / observations enable the researcher to develop a consensus about the problem they set out to investigate?
Is there a pattern of observations consistent with a broader hypothesis?
Were these observations hypothesized by the researcher?
6. Broader implications of the work
How does this work add to the body of knowledge on the topic?
Are there any practical or theoretical applications from your findings or implications for future research?
*** This is general structure – you summary may require more focus on specific parts – which is OK ***Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rers20
Ethnic and Racial Studies
ISSN: 0141-9870 (Print) 1466-4356 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rers20
I know who I am, but who do they think I am?
Muslim perspectives on encounters with airport
authorities
Leda Blackwood , Nick Hopkins & Steve Reicher
To cite this article: Leda Blackwood , Nick Hopkins & Steve Reicher (2013) I know who I am, but
who do they think I am? Muslim perspectives on encounters with airport authorities, Ethnic and
Racial Studies, 36:6, 1090-1108, DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2011.645845
To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2011.645845
Published online: 30 Jan 2012.
Submit your article to this journal
Article views: 2447
View related articles
Citing articles: 36 View citing articles
https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rers20
https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rers20
https://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1080/01419870.2011.645845
https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2011.645845
https://www.tandfonline.com/action/authorSubmission?journalCode=rers20&show=instructions
https://www.tandfonline.com/action/authorSubmission?journalCode=rers20&show=instructions
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/mlt/10.1080/01419870.2011.645845
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/mlt/10.1080/01419870.2011.645845
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/citedby/10.1080/01419870.2011.645845#tabModule
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/citedby/10.1080/01419870.2011.645845#tabModule
I know who I am, but who do they think I
am? Muslim perspectives on encounters
with airport authorities
Leda Blackwood, Nick Hopkins and Steve Reicher
(First submission January 2011; First published January 2012)
Abstract
In this paper we report an analysis of individual and group interviews
with thirty-eight Scottish Muslims concerning their encounters with
authority � especially those at airports. Our analysis shows that a key
theme in interviewees’ talk of their experience in this context concerns the
denial and misrecognition of valued identities such as being British, being
respectable and being Muslim. One reason why such experiences are so
problematic concerns the denial of agency associated with being posi-
tioned in terms that are not one’s own. The implications of these findings
for understanding the dynamics of intergroup relations are discussed.
Keywords: Social identities; national identity; social exclusion; Muslims; border
surveillance; belonging.
That’s the debate, Andrew. That is absolutely the heart of the
debate. And the West’s gotta resolve this debate. Is the reason
why they’re like that because of us, or is it actually because of
them? Now, my view in the end is we should stop being in a
situation where we think we’ve caused this. We haven’t caused
this. (Tony Blair, BBC interview, 1 September, 2010)
Analysing tension
Why Choose Us
- 100% non-plagiarized Papers
- 24/7 /365 Service Available
- Affordable Prices
- Any Paper, Urgency, and Subject
- Will complete your papers in 6 hours
- On-time Delivery
- Money-back and Privacy guarantees
- Unlimited Amendments upon request
- Satisfaction guarantee
How it Works
- Click on the “Place Order” tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
- Fill in your paper’s requirements in the "PAPER DETAILS" section.
- Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
- Click “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
- From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.